Cloud infrastructure migration services
Cloud & Server Infrastructure Migration
On-premise to AWS, Azure, or GCP migration, from lift-and-shift rehosting to full cloud-native rearchitecting, planned around your actual workload dependencies.
Not every workload should migrate the same way.
Cloud infrastructure migration projects go wrong most often when every workload gets the same treatment, either all rehosted as-is, missing the cost and performance benefits of cloud-native services, or all rearchitected, burning budget on workloads that didn’t need it.
- Aging on-premise infrastructure with rising maintenance costs
- No clear plan for which workloads to rehost versus rearchitect
- Cross-system dependencies that make migration sequencing risky
- Security controls that need to be rebuilt, not just replicated, in the cloud
What a cloud migration engagement covers
Every workload is assessed individually for the right migration approach.
Workload assessment
Every application and dependency inventoried and classified for rehosting or rearchitecting.
Migration sequencing
A staged plan that minimizes cross-system risk during the transition.
Security & access rebuild
Network controls, encryption, and identity management configured for the new environment.
Validated cutover
Performance validated against current benchmarks before on-premise infrastructure is decommissioned.
Talk to a senior migration engineer before you commit to a build.
Free 15 minute discovery call. No resellers, no sales script.
How we migrate infrastructure without a one-size-fits-all approach
Workload & dependency audit
We assess every workload individually, not as a single blanket migration.
Rehost vs. rearchitect decisions
Each workload gets the migration approach that fits its actual requirements.
Staged migration
Workloads move in a sequence designed to minimize cross-system risk.
Validated go-live
Performance and security validated before any on-premise infrastructure is decommissioned.
Why cloud migration project plans need a rehost-or-rearchitect decision per workload
Mainframe to cloud migration and on-premise to cloud migration projects both hit the same decision point repeatedly: should this specific workload move as-is, or should it be redesigned to use cloud-native services. AWS cloud migration services and azure cloud infrastructure migration both support either approach, but treating every workload the same way usually means overpaying for some and underperforming on others.
Server virtualization migration and broader cloud infrastructure refactoring work best when sequenced around actual dependencies, migrating a workload before the systems it depends on are ready just moves the outage risk instead of eliminating it. A migration plan that respects those dependencies is what keeps a multi-workload cloud transition from becoming a multi-month fire drill.
Trusted by founders and operations leaders
They correctly identified which of our systems needed a full rearchitect and which just needed rehosting. Saved us real budget.
Our on-premise-to-cloud migration happened with zero unplanned outages across twelve interconnected systems.
Security review caught gaps in our access controls that had existed for years on-premise.
They correctly identified which of our systems needed a full rearchitect and which just needed rehosting. Saved us real budget.
Our on-premise-to-cloud migration happened with zero unplanned outages across twelve interconnected systems.
Security review caught gaps in our access controls that had existed for years on-premise.
Questions US founders ask about this service
By assessing each workload for rehosting versus rearchitecting, provisioning the cloud environment to match or exceed current capacity, migrating data and applications in a staged sequence, and validating performance before decommissioning on-premise infrastructure.
Network security group configuration matching or improving on-premise controls, encryption for data at rest and in transit, identity and access management review, and a security audit of the new environment before go-live.
Cost depends on the number of workloads, whether they’re rehosted as-is or rearchitected for cloud-native services, and data transfer volume, rather than a flat per-server rate.
Rehosting moves an application to the cloud with minimal changes, a lift-and-shift. Rearchitecting redesigns the application to use cloud-native services, which costs more upfront but typically reduces long-term operating costs and improves scalability.
Inventory every workload and dependency, classify each for rehosting or rearchitecting, sequence migrations to minimize cross-system risk, and define validation criteria and a rollback plan for each stage.